Poland - Servers

Description

1) The subject of the contract is the supply of network switches, firewalls and servers, divided into three parts:1) Part No. 1: Supply of firewalls in accordance with the following list:a) Firewall-FW1- 6 pieces . b) Firewall-FW2- 2 pieces . c) Firewall-FW3- 3 pieces. 2) Part No. 2: Supply of network switches according to the following list:a) Network switch SW1-1- 4 piecesb) Network switch SW1-2- 2 pieces .c) Network switch SW1-3 - 2 pcsd) Network switch SW2 - 2 szte) Network switch SW3 - 2 pcsf) SFP+ inserts- 132 pcs g)QSFP expansion module 4 szth) SFP expansion module - 2 pcs3)Part No. 3: Supply of servers according to the following list:a) Server type 1 - 6 pcs b) Server type 2- 3 pcs c) Server type 3- 3 pcsd) Server type 4 - 6 pcs e) Server type 5 - 3 pcsf) Server type 6 -1 pcsg) Server type 7 - 8 pcs2.A detailed description of the subject matter of the order is contained in Appendix No. 1 to the SWZ (answer for Part No. 1,Part No. 2 and Part No. 3).
The subject of the order is the supply of firewalls in accordance with the following list:1) Firewall-FW1 - 6 pieces. The term of delivery of equipment - up to 90 calendar days from the date of conclusion of the Agreement2) Firewall-FW2 - 2 pieces. Hardware delivery date - up to 90 calendar days from the date of conclusion of the Agreement3) Firewall-FW3 - 3 pieces . Deadline for delivery of equipment - up to 90 calendar days from the date of conclusion of the Agreement2. A detailed description of the subject matter of the contract is included in Attachment No. 1 to the SOPZ for Part No. 1.3. In cases where the SOPZ indicates trademarks, patents, origin, source or a particular process that characterizes the products or services provided by a particular Economic Operator which would lead to a preference or elimination of certain Economic Operators or products, it means that the Contracting Authority cannot describe the subject matter of the contract using sufficiently precise terms and this is justified by the specificity of the subject matter of the contract. In such situations, any indication of trademarks, patents, origin, source or a particular process shall be read with the words "or equivalent".4. Where references to standards, technical evaluations, technical specifications and reference systems referred to in Article 101(1)(2) and (3) of the PPL Act have been used in the description of the subject matter of the contract, the Contracting Authority shall, pursuant to Article 101(4) of the PPL Act, allow the use of equivalent solutions. Whenever a standard, technical evaluation, technical specification or technical reference system is indicated in this SOP, it shall be assumed that the phrase "or equivalent" is used in reference to it.5. By equivalent solutions, the Contracting Authority understands such Equipment that meets the conditions specified in the SOP to an equivalent degree. The Contractor who invokes equivalent solutions described by the Contracting Authority shall be obliged to prove in its offer, in particular by means of the subject evidence referred to in Articles 104-107 of the PPL Act, that the solutions proposed by it in an equivalent degree meet the requirements specified in the description of the subject matter of the contract. Evidence, in particular by means of the subject evidence referred to in Article 104-107 of the PPL Act, confirming that the solutions proposed by the Economic Operator to an equivalent degree meet the requirements specified in the description of the subject matter of the contract are not subject to supplementation.6. The Contracting Authority requires submission with the bid of the subject documents for Part 1 of the proceedings:1) Statement of the Manufacturer or the Manufacturer's Authorized Distributor, or other document confirming that the bidder is authorized by the Manufacturer to sell the offered solutions.2) Statements of the Manufacturer or the Authorized Distributor providing technical support that they are ready to provide the required service to the Purchaser (including: website address of the service and telephone hotline number).3) ISO 9001 Certificate or equivalent of the entity servicing the offered equipment.7. The Purchaser provides for supplementing the subject evidence If the Vendor has not submitted these measures with the bid or they are incomplete or contain errors, the Purchaser will call for their supplementation. (1) The subject of the contract is the supply of network switches in accordance with the following list:1) Network switch SW1-1 - 4 pieces. The date of delivery of equipment up to 90 calendar days from the date of conclusion of the Agreement2) Network switch SW1-2 - 2 pieces . Hardware delivery date up to 90 calendar days from the date of conclusion of the Agreement3) Network switch SW1-3 - 2 pieces. Hardware delivery date up to 90 calendar days from the date of conclusion of the Agreement4) Network switch SW2 - 2 pieces . Hardware delivery date up to 90 calendar days from the date of conclusion of the Agreement5) Network switch SW3 - 2 pieces. Hardware delivery date up to 90 calendar days from the date of conclusion of the Agreement6) SFP+ inserts - 132 pieces . Hardware delivery date up to 90 calendar days from the date of conclusion of the Agreement7) QSFP Expansion Module - 4 pieces. Hardware delivery date up to 120 calendar days from the date of conclusion of the Agreement8) SFP+ Expansion Module - 2 pieces. Hardware delivery date up to 120 calendar days from the date of conclusion of the Agreement2. A detailed description of the subject matter of the contract is included in Attachment No. 1 to the SOPZ for Part No. 2.3. In cases where the SOPZ indicates trademarks, patents, origin, source or a particular process that characterizes the products or services provided by a particular Economic Operator which would lead to a preference or elimination of certain Economic Operators or products, it means that the Contracting Authority cannot describe the subject matter of the contract using sufficiently precise terms and this is justified by the specificity of the subject matter of the contract. In such situations, any indication of trademarks, patents, origin, source or a particular process shall be read with the words "or equivalent".4. Where references to standards, technical evaluations, technical specifications and reference systems referred to in Article 101(1)(2) and (3) of the PPL Act have been used in the description of the subject matter of the contract, the Contracting Authority shall, pursuant to Article 101(4) of the PPL Act, allow the use of equivalent solutions. Whenever a standard, technical evaluation, technical specification or technical reference system is indicated in this SOP, it shall be assumed that the phrase "or equivalent" is used in reference to it.5. By equivalent solutions, the Contracting Authority understands such Equipment that meets the conditions specified in the SOP to an equivalent degree. The Contractor who invokes equivalent solutions described by the Contracting Authority shall be obliged to prove in its offer, in particular by means of the subject evidence referred to in Articles 104-107 of the PPL Act, that the solutions proposed by it in an equivalent degree meet the requirements specified in the description of the subject matter of the contract. Evidence, in particular with the subject means of proof referred to in Article 104-107 of the PPL Act, confirming that the solutions proposed by the Contractor to an equivalent degree meet the requirements specified in the description of the subject of the contract are not subject to supplementation.6The Contracting Authority requires submission with the bid of the subject matter documents for Part 2 of the proceedings:1) A statement of the manufacturer or authorized service partner of the equipment and software certifying the origin of the equipment from an authorized sales channel.7. The Contracting Authority provides for supplementation of the subject matter evidence If the Vendor has not submitted these measures with the bid or they are incomplete or contain errors, the Contracting Authority will call for their supplementation. (1) The subject of the contract is the supply of servers in accordance with the following list:1) Server type 1- 6 pieces. The term of delivery of equipment to 60 days counted from the date of conclusion of the contract2) Server type 2 - 3 pieces. The term of delivery of equipment up to 60 days counted from the date of conclusion of the contract3) Server type 3 - 3 pieces. Hardware delivery period up to 60 days counted from the date of conclusion of the contract4) Server type 4 - 6 pieces. Hardware delivery date up to 60 days counted from the date of conclusion of the contract5) Server type 5 - 3 pieces. Hardware delivery date up to 60 days counted from the date of conclusion of the contract6) Server type 6 - 1 piece. Deadline for delivery of equipment up to 60 days counted from the date of conclusion of the contract 7) Server type 7 - 8 pieces.Deadline for delivery of equipment up to 60 days counted from the date of conclusion of the contract 2. A detailed description of the subject matter of the contract is contained in Appendix No. 1 to the SOPZ for Part No. 3.3. In cases where the SOPZ indicates trademarks, patents, origin, source or a particular process that characterizes the products or services provided by a particular Economic Operator which would lead to a privilege or elimination of certain Economic Operators or products, it means that the Contracting Authority cannot describe the subject matter of the contract using sufficiently precise terms and this is justified by the specificity of the subject matter of the contract. In such situations, any indication of trademarks, patents, origin, source or a particular process shall be read with the words "or equivalent".4. Where references to standards, technical evaluations, technical specifications and reference systems referred to in Article 101(1)(2) and (3) of the PPL Act have been used in the description of the subject matter of the contract, the Contracting Authority shall, pursuant to Article 101(4) of the PPL Act, allow the use of equivalent solutions. Whenever a standard, technical evaluation, technical specification or technical reference system is indicated in this SOP, it shall be assumed that the phrase "or equivalent" is used in reference to it.5. By equivalent solutions, the Contracting Authority understands such Equipment that meets the conditions specified in the SOP to an equivalent degree. The Contractor who invokes equivalent solutions described by the Contracting Authority shall be obliged to prove in its offer, in particular by means of the subject evidence referred to in Articles 104-107 of the PPL Act, that the solutions proposed by it in an equivalent degree meet the requirements specified in the description of the subject matter of the contract. Evidence, in particular with the subject means of proof referred to in Article 104-107 of the PPL Act, proving that the solutions proposed by the Contractor in an equivalent degree meet the requirements specified in the description of the subject of the contract are not subject to supplementation.

Opportunity closing date

26 September 2022

Value of contract

to be confirmed